Visit our new blog. It lists all the new things that we are doing and what new material has been added to our site. We even list new missionaries who sign up with us for technical support so you can pray for them. FCM News
An Introduction
to the Gospel According to Luke Authorship
The Gospel according to Luke exhibits several
differences from the other Synoptic Gospels. For instance, Luke
is the only Gospel to have a sequel, the Acts of the Apostles.
These two books are often referred to as a single unit called
Luke-Acts. Another difference between Luke and the other Synoptics
is the prologue (1:1-4). Luke's prologue can also be called an
exordium, which is a literary device that was also used by other
Greek writers. There is a striking similarity between the structure
of Josephus' Against Apion and Luke-Acts. Not only does the prologue
enable readers to better understand the purpose of the Gospel,
but it also makes the destination clear. Unfortunately, and in
a similar fashion to the other Synoptics, the author does not
directly identify himself within the text. On the other hand
there is enough internal and external evidence to conclude that
it was written by Luke the physician. Because the book of Acts
is the sequel to Luke, it should be considered when trying to
define the author. In certain sections of Acts, the author uses
the first person plural in the narrative (Acts 16:10-17; 20:5-15;
21:1-8; 27:1-28:16). These are usually referred to as the we-sections
and would indicate that the author of Acts accompanied Paul at
these times. Luke is the only one that would fit into this mold
according to Paul's epistles. Externally, even the earliest manuscripts
support the title "According to Luke" (KATA
LOUKAN). Much of early church tradition also believed that Luke
wrote this Gospel.
The name Luke is only mentioned three times
in the New Testament. From these three occurrences, it is evident
that Luke was a physician (Col 4:14) and a companion of Paul
(2 Tim 4:11; Philem 1:24). It is more than likely that Luke was
a Gentile, but he was not necessarily a Greek. It also seems
as if Luke had some degree of association with Judaism because
of his knowledge of the Septuagint (LXX)—the
Greek translation of the Old Testament. Not only did Luke compose
the longest Gospel, but he also wrote more than any other New Testament
writer. This is remarkable considering the amount of attention
he gets in comparison to John and Paul.
Date and Location of Composition
The Gospel according to Luke was probably the last Synoptic Gospel
to be written. Since Luke precedes Acts, it is essential to date
Acts before a date for Luke can be determined. The abrupt ending
of Acts may be the single most important factor in deriving a date.
Luke leaves the reader with Paul being in Rome and waiting to present
his case before Caesar. The best explanation for this is that Acts
was finished before he Paul's final outcome was known. This would
place Acts in the early Sixties with the Gospel of Luke being written
in the late Fifties or early Sixties.
Other factors that support an early date are the uncertainty of
where Christianity fits in amongst the religions of the Roman Empire,
Luke-Acts does not mention the destruction of Jerusalem, and the
uncertainty of Jew-Gentile relations at the same level as in Paul's
epistles.
Regarding its location, it is generally agreed that Luke-Acts
was not written in Palestine. Other suggestions have included Caesarea,
Achaia, Decapolis, Asia Minor, and Rome.
Audience and Purpose
Both the purpose of the Gospel and its audience
can be found in the prologue (1:1-4). Luke first mentions that
many others before him have made an account of the things that
have been fulfilled as they were handed down from the first generation.
He also says that he cautiously examined everything from the
beginning and this led him to write an organized account to Theophilus
so that he might know the certainty of what he has been taught.
It is obvious that Luke wrote to Theophilus, but who was Theophilus?
There have been many theories trying to answer this question.
First of all, the name Theophilus means, "lover of God," or "friend
of God." It is unclear whether he was already a Christian,
or if he was considering becoming one. Luke (1:3) refers to Theophilus
using the words "most excellent" (kratistoV). Since this
seems to refer to nobility, most of the theories on Theophilus
state that he was either a government official or an influential
citizen. A widely accepted theory is that Theophilus was Luke's
patron and helped him to publish Luke-Acts.
Luke's purpose in writing the Gospel has also suffered debate.
Some suggest that Luke set out to make a case for Christianity
as not being a threat to the Roman Empire. Others make the proposition
that Luke-Acts was written to reassure those questioning Jesus'
second coming because of its delay. Many believe that Luke was
not writing to Theophilus exclusively, but that the two-volume
work was intended to be distributed for ecclesiastical purposes.
There is also the view, which seems to be growing in popularity,
that Luke-Acts was specifically designed to aid Paul in his trial
before Caesar.
Theology and Themes
Luke is often viewed as the historian of the
apostolic age, yet many do not fully recognize him as a theologian
as well. The author develops many themes in his Gospel. One of
the most notable themes is of Redemption History by which he
views the world in three major time periods. First, the time
of the "Law and the Prophets" was
in effect until John the Baptist (16:16a). After that came the
time period of Jesus, when "the gospel of the kingdom of God
has been preached" (16:16b). The last time period begins after
the ascension of Christ and continues until his return. This is
the period of the church.
The idea of salvation is also prevalent in Luke's
Gospel. The words "salvation/deliverance" (swthria) and "salvation/saving
power" (swthrion) are used by Luke, but are not found in Matthew
and Mark. Not only is the theme of salvation evident, but Luke
also demonstrates Jesus as being sympathetic towards Samaritans
and Gentiles (e.g. Good Samaritan 10:30-37; Centurion 7:2-10, see
also 2:32).
Other issues such as peace, eschatology, early Catholicism, the
plan of God, emphases on individuals, importance of women, children,
the poor, the disreputable, the passion, prayer, and praise are
also a part of Luke's theology.
Literary Style and Structure
Along with the Epistle to the Hebrews, Luke-Acts
is of the best Greek in the New Testament. The exordium (1:1-4),
which demonstrates a pure Lukan style, is often looked at as
more sophisticated and excellent a portion of Greek than of any
other New Testament writing. On the other hand, there are parts
of Luke's Gospel where he decides to follow some of the Hebraisms
of Mark and of the LXX. Regarding this, Ellis said that Luke
1-2 and Acts 1-12 contain "a pervasive
Semitic coloring."
The structure of Luke's Gospel begins with the exordium (1:1-4),
followed by the births of John the Baptist and Jesus (1:3-2:52).
Luke then covers John's ministry and the preparation of Jesus'
ministry (3:1-4:13). He then gives account of Jesus' Galilean ministry
(4:14-9:50), and his journey to Jerusalem (9:51-19:27). Jesus'
time in Jerusalem (19:28-24:53) can be divided up into his ministry
(19:28-21:38), the passion (22:1-23:56), and his resurrection and
ascension (24:1-53).